I also think we should strive to change the language.
To oppose “gun control” arguments, the first approach is: Refuse to use their terms. As explained fully in the book, Death by “Gun Control,” the term “gun control” is Orwellian Newspeak that itself biases the debate. Therefore, we nearly always use the correct terms: “victim disarmament” or “citizen disarmament.”
We hear the argument: “How can you be against sensible gun laws?” The response is: “How can you favor disarming victims when the aggressors are armed?”
I found this article online. It was not credited to one individual, but to a group called JPFO Liberty Crew.
Four Key Points to Defend Your Rights
By JPFO Liberty Crew // 07/01/2007
I don't consider myself a victim, but for the sake of the "gun control" argument, I like the term "victim disarmament".