Delaware Concealed Carry Forum

General Gun Discussion => Handgun Corner => Topic started by: Andrew1986 on January 18, 2016, 02:35:58 PM

Title: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 18, 2016, 02:35:58 PM
I am contemplating getting the Glock 42 or the 43 wanted to see if anyone here who personally has either can give their pros and cons. Main reason is for concealed carry which would be carried in an IWB holster.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: CorBon on January 18, 2016, 03:40:24 PM
No personal experience with either, but considering that they are nearly identical in size, and if this would be your main carry piece -- why go with a 380 instead of a 9?  Also, most reviews that I've seen seem to question why anyone would choose a 43 over a 26.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: MarkB on January 18, 2016, 03:40:51 PM
I don't have either gun but here is an article that may help. Since they are similar in size, I would go with the 9mm.

http://loadoutroom.com/15748/glock-42-43-first-impressions/

Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: oldgraygeek on January 18, 2016, 03:53:11 PM
I had a Glock 42, but I sold it and bought a Glock 43. You're welcome to try my 43, if we can set up a time that works...
(Difficulty: we'll be gone for the next 2 weeks).
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: RetCapt1994 on January 18, 2016, 06:16:34 PM
I purchased a G42 when they were first released. This is an excellent concealment piece. I carried this in a Galco Ankle Glove as a BUG. The G42 is a very soft shooter and it never gave me a problem. I purchased a G43 when it was released. I was very impressed and it is also an excellent concealment weapon. The G43 is also a good shooter and it never gave me a problem. I carry the G26 in the winter months and the G43 is carried in the warmer/summer months. Both weapons are about the same size.  The G43 for me will not work in an ankle rig. The G42 is the maximum size for the ankle for me. I am not into IWB holsters but both weapons would be no problem. Both are very narrow and were designed for maximum concealment. I have eight mags for each and one half of each is with the finger extension. I did feel a bit uneasy with less rounds than in the G26 but I also carry at least one extra mag. Even though the G43 is a "summer gun" it is also carried about 40% of the time in the winter. If you get a G43 or a G43 I would highly recommend the DeSantis Incognito (pouch type) holster. This rig is awesome and it really looks like a cell phone pouch. If I can be of any further assistance just let me know. Since both weapons are about same size IMHO it is better to carry a 9mm than a 380. Again the 380 makes a great BUG.Sorry this post got so lengthy. All the best to everyone.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 18, 2016, 07:59:17 PM
I had a Glock 42, but I sold it and bought a Glock 43. You're welcome to try my 43, if we can set up a time that works...
(Difficulty: we'll be gone for the next 2 weeks).

May take you up on that where do you usually go shooting.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 18, 2016, 08:01:34 PM
Thanks everyone biggest thing for me is if the weight is not that much noticeable from the 43 vs 42 I'll go with the 43 also seems like 380 ammo is expensive. I currently have a glock model 22 just doesn't work as my carry gun anymore to big and heavy. I used to 290 lbs so the model 22 was nothing. I'm now 185 so I need something smaller again thanks everyone.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: oldgraygeek on January 18, 2016, 08:58:02 PM
I had a Glock 42, but I sold it and bought a Glock 43. You're welcome to try my 43, if we can set up a time that works...
(Difficulty: we'll be gone for the next 2 weeks).

May take you up on that where do you usually go shooting.

We usually go to Targetmaster.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 18, 2016, 11:45:19 PM
Sounds good I'm about 10 minutes from TargetMaster.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: RetCapt1994 on January 19, 2016, 04:32:41 PM
Andrew, Kudos to you on your weight loss. This sends a message that you are a self disciplined person and my hat goes off to you. All the best to you and I am sure you will keep the weight off.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Tonym on January 19, 2016, 11:28:26 PM
I carry a 43. Its great. I put a +2 on the 2nd mag Very accurate. I dont know why anyone would even consider a 42 since the 43 came out. The 42 seems like the only glock i ever hear people complain about jamming
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 20, 2016, 11:29:06 AM
Thanks for your input yeah I've settled with goingv with the 43 now to figure out where to buy it. I know TargetMaster has it $499 cash $514 credit.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 20, 2016, 11:30:18 AM
Andrew, Kudos to you on your weight loss. This sends a message that you are a self disciplined person and my hat goes off to you. All the best to you and I am sure you will keep the weight off.

Thank you sir. Lot of hard work but worth it I've kept the weight off for about 3 years. I lived in PA my whole life before we moved to DE in April. PA CCW permits was way easier and less hoops to jump through.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: del elec on January 20, 2016, 07:39:50 PM
Contact Federal Firearms on this site. 302-300-0590 Chris Feghali is a great guy and he'll definitely take care of you. I must warn you though, once you go there you won't be able to stay away. If you buy it from Targetmaster you'll have to pay PA sales tax and they'll have to ship it to a DE FFL and you'll have to pay the transfer fee.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 20, 2016, 09:10:21 PM
Thanks. Also talked to Millers Gun Center they didn't have the Glock 43 but same price as TargetMaster. I'll contact the number above to see about price.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Lumspond on January 20, 2016, 09:20:12 PM
Ugh...Millers....rudest gun shop I've ever been in. Was there once in the 90's, and have never returned.
Use Chris, as previously suggested. He is just below Middletown in NCC. He will treat you well.
Cheers.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Andrew1986 on January 21, 2016, 12:49:19 AM
Will do I'll give federal firearms a call tomorrow.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: JonathanG on January 21, 2016, 12:57:01 AM
Will do I'll give federal firearms a call tomorrow.

You won't regret dealing with Chris at Federal Firearms.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Landmgr on January 21, 2016, 11:49:39 PM
Check out Trinity Tactical in Middletown. They had the lowest price on my Glock 19 gen 4. Give them a call and get a price.  Good luck.  http://www.trintacusa.com
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Tonym on January 22, 2016, 02:20:21 AM
I buy all my guns from chris. Hes been able to beat everyones price plus hes a nice honest person. Its pretty much the exact opposite of millers
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: PPScarry on January 30, 2016, 01:34:06 PM
I'm glad someone told me about Chris at Federal Firearms. I have bough several handguns there and his eye candy long guns are talking to me. I have one problem with handguns though, can't get enough of them. AR's are looking good there and will buy one soon.
 
It's nice buying a firearm there sitting on a couch watching OAN while waiting for the background check. Very popular place lately and it's cheek to cheek on the couch anymore! Chris is cooler than the other side of the pillow and his knowledge is second to none.
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: Adrenolin on February 01, 2016, 05:40:10 AM
I'll be seeing Chris later this week to pickup a new rifle and possibly something from his rack or back room while there.  ;D He gets most of my business either directly or to receive anything I order online.



Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: PPScarry on February 01, 2016, 02:48:03 PM
Just want to add that I have never, ever had a problem with the 42 jamming but I won't shoot junk either. As far as firepower of the 42 and 43, ask Chris. He'll tell you it's not the caliber of the gun but the bullet you put in it, as there is devastating 380 ammo and penetrates.

That said 380 ammo is more expensive than 9mm so practice with a 22 if that is your concern.

I was hesitant on the 380 until I loaded it with Liberty 50 gr 1500fps Civil Defense. You watch me shoot this in some jelly and you got to pay for the whole seat but you'll only need the edge of it! It will FUU.  :o

Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: JOET on February 02, 2016, 12:13:39 PM
Just want to add that I have never, ever had a problem with the 42 jamming but I won't shoot junk either. As far as firepower of the 42 and 43, ask Chris. He'll tell you it's not the caliber of the gun but the bullet you put in it, as there is devastating 380 ammo and penetrates.

That said 380 ammo is more expensive than 9mm so practice with a 22 if that is your concern.

I was hesitant on the 380 until I loaded it with Liberty 50 gr 1500fps Civil Defense. You watch me shoot this in some jelly and you got to pay for the whole seat but you'll only need the edge of it! It will FUU.  :o


[/quote

you are right on about the ammo...nothing better
Title: Re: Glock 42 vs 43
Post by: megacollect on February 03, 2016, 08:01:17 PM
G42 is an excellent concealment gun. I have enough confidence to even stick it in my jacket pocket when im jogging. Only gripes are a long and stiff trigger pull and ammo is way more expensive than 9.