Since you guys are very pro-Glock, here is what I am faced with and need some advice. My current handgun arsenal mainly consists of Sigs and H&K's for semi-autos and Taurus revolvers. I have never owned a Glock but hear nothing but good things about them. I am 6 foot tall and 150lbs and I am looking for a subcompact for CC that won't print too much, if at all. I am considering the 26 or 27 baby Glocks, but wanted some advice. Since I am used to .40, as that what my Sig 229 is chambered for, should I go with the G27 and stay with a .40 or drop down to a G26 and back down to 9MM? Since the Glocks are 10ozs lighter than my Sig, will the G27 kick substantially more than my Sig229 because it is a lighter gun? If so, would the G26 be a better choice for faster target re-aquisition? I know smaller guns than the Glock 26 and 27 can be had, but I have heard and read too many horror stories about Kahrs, Kel-Techs and others and that fact that too many people report FTF's with them. I am not afraid of price, but I know I need multiple carry guns so I can be prepared for any clothing choice. I am sure I can carry my Sig in the cooler months and winter, but I need something a little smaller for summer that is still built to the high quality standards I am used to with the Sig and HK's.
Any advice? I am remaining open minded on this issue, so any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help.