Author Topic: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM  (Read 34555 times)

FIREFIGHTER7248

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #30 on: May 02, 2013, 03:05:14 AM »
It's just the beginning of the end!  You all had better buy a @@@@ good slingshot and stockpile all the rocks you can before they ban and outlaw rocks next!
Sussex County

groundgrid

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 321
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #31 on: May 02, 2013, 03:31:57 AM »
The following is a link to a spreadsheet showing the most recent information that I have regarding how each Representative will vote.
Ones marked with a * are assumed because of their position as a bill sponsor or by observations of their conduct at hearings etc.

Please try to get your rep to send you an e-mail regarding their position. Have your friends in other districts do the same.
If they will not respond to you, have someone else send them a simple e-mail asking if they are for or against the bill.
Reps will often not respond regarding issues when they do not agree with you.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12508970/DE%20Gun%20Bill%20Positions.xlsx

If you can't deal with Excell, the following link will get you the PDF version:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12508970/DE%20Gun%20Bill%20Positions.pdf

I will add other bills as time permits.
Please post your reps position or PM it to me so that it can be added to the spreadsheet.


1). It's not over until the bill becomes law
2). If it does, we will make it clear that they will loose their jobs next election
Here’s the real issue: when your religion is government, and government is god, you cannot tolerate any other God before it
(The reason why Liberal/Progressives have waged a war on Christianity)

JOET

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #32 on: May 02, 2013, 12:13:35 PM »
Good spreadsheet, pretty sure M. Mulroney is a NO..
New Castle County

Radnor

  • Administrator
  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2382
  • New Castle Co.
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #33 on: May 02, 2013, 12:26:29 PM »
Talked to Blevins before leaving Legislative Hall yesterday, she said she did not think it would pass.
Although she received a grade of "C" from nrapva.  So maybe it was smoke being blown up my ___.
NRA Certified Instructor and Training Counselor
CRSO, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection In and Outside The Home, Home Firearm Safety, & Reloading.

Knowledge, skills, & experience have value. If you expect to profit from someone's you should expect to pay.

formerly known as frank

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 353
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #34 on: May 02, 2013, 02:07:57 PM »
Because Andria Bennett voted no against HB 35, it may be fair to assume, she will vote no here.

Poppop XDM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #35 on: May 02, 2013, 02:11:24 PM »
I nnderstand Lopez said he would vote no but he voted yea on background checks
Kent County

Hootbro

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #36 on: May 02, 2013, 02:56:05 PM »
I nnderstand Lopez said he would vote no but he voted yea on background checks

Background checks was low hanging fruit. While any infringement is a travesty, background checks from a political perspective is the least serious.

groundgrid

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 321
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #37 on: May 02, 2013, 03:08:41 PM »
Once this session is over, I'll use the spreadsheet to calculate an "Infringement Score" that we can use during the next election.
Will include their vote on background checks as well as the other bills.

Here’s the real issue: when your religion is government, and government is god, you cannot tolerate any other God before it
(The reason why Liberal/Progressives have waged a war on Christianity)

Cbmarine

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1396
  • III Marine Amphib Corps. My dad’s shoulder patch
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #38 on: May 02, 2013, 04:22:26 PM »
Rep Jaques said he plans to vote no on HB 58.

 Speaker Schwartzkopf lectured us on carefully reading the bill before we sent an email (make sure that you do). He cited the emails about .22 mags being banned but the tubular mags are not banned in the bill. Someone before me directly responded to him in his 2 minutes that the most popular 22 rifle is the Ruger 10/22 that can accept a mag that would be banned. I almost applauded.

The problem with Mitchell's bill is that it seeks to reduce the severity of incidents rather than preventing them. Inhibiting the sheepdogs by limiting mag sizes is wrong approach. Mitchell, who is a retired LEO, said he would "consider" exempting CCDWs. Retired LEOs are exempt; why not retired military?
« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 04:07:40 AM by Cbmarine »
Just a smelly deplorable dreg of society clinging to God and guns.
New Castle County
_..  .  _._   _..  ..._ _  .  ._.

Lumspond

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
  • NRA life member
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #39 on: May 02, 2013, 08:03:12 PM »
Thanks for putting that together, and keeping it updated groundgrid.
Maybe also add a colum for "R" or "D".
New Castle County

LightninSVT

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #40 on: May 02, 2013, 09:09:31 PM »
...and change the top to HB 58, not 67.  That's the School Safety zone bill that passed committee last week.  Another one I would like to see fail.

seniorgeek

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #41 on: May 03, 2013, 02:32:46 AM »
More emails with results:
William Carson - NO
Rebecca Walker - NO

Still waiting responses from more.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NRA Member
Combat Veteran
Southeastern Sussex County

groundgrid

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 321
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #42 on: May 03, 2013, 03:12:34 AM »
Spreadsheet has been corrected & updated. Party Affiliations have been added.
2 additional bill have been added.

I will try make updates at least every other day.

Link:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12508970/DE%20Gun%20Bill%20Positions.xlsx

Note that the link will not change with updates & can be bookmarked for direct access.
Here’s the real issue: when your religion is government, and government is god, you cannot tolerate any other God before it
(The reason why Liberal/Progressives have waged a war on Christianity)

Cbmarine

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1396
  • III Marine Amphib Corps. My dad’s shoulder patch
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #43 on: May 03, 2013, 04:13:39 AM »
@groundgrid, is it safe to assume the sponsors of the bill will vote for the bill?

House Bill # 58

Primary Sponsor:   Mitchell    Additional Sponsor(s):    Sen. Peterson
CoSponsors:   Reps. Barbieri, Bolden, Heffernan, Kowalko, Longhurst, Potter, Schwartzkopf, Scott; Sens. Henry, Sokola
Just a smelly deplorable dreg of society clinging to God and guns.
New Castle County
_..  .  _._   _..  ..._ _  .  ._.

Just Bill

  • Life Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: HB-58 High Cap Mag BAN hearing- Wed. 5/1 @ 2:30 PM
« Reply #44 on: May 03, 2013, 11:27:13 AM »
I sent off a bunch of e-mails to elected fouls yesterday, including turncoat Cathy Cloutier, hers came back as not deliverable(???).  I think we have the wrong address. cloutiercathy@aol.com, keeps coming back.

Just looked it up, should be cloutier.cathy@aol.com
« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 11:29:52 AM by Just Bill »
NRA Cert. Instructor Pistol/Rifle/Shotgun
NRA Lifer
NRA RSO
DE/PA CCDW permits
AGI certified gunsmith--Cowboy Action/1911/Glock/rifle/pistol/shotgun/rimfire
AGI Firearms Appraiser/FFL 01
AGI certified Master Gunsmith