How could they do otherwise: he is presumably running against the most anti-gun candidate in history.
You mean besides Obama, right?
She's way worse than Obama on guns.
Obama hates guns to his core, and the only thing that he had a substantial record for going into office was his anti-gun views. I personally believe that the only reason that he hasn't done more anti-gun stuff is because his views foreshadow his intentions. So, it's easy to see spot that any anti-gun arguments from him aren't about making America better -- they're about his hatred of guns.
I am surprised, though, that Hillary is coming out so strong on anti-gun views, considering Team Billary's statements a few years ago that the '94 ban was one of [their] worst decisions -- as evidenced by the repercussions in '96.
Just the same, both are for more guns/walls/anti-tanks mines/poison gas or whatever it takes to keep THEM safe -- and to absolute Hell with everyone else. And I also realize that ALL of the politicians use gun rights the same way that they use race, unions, and Medicare -- as a means of gathering voters. Some may have personal views on the subject (such as anti-gunners often do), but if any one of them thought that changing the national anthem to "Happy Birthday" and praising Satan would get him/her elected, that person would be on that bandwagon like a bum on a baloney sandwich...
